|
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.
// See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
namespace Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax
{
using Green = InternalSyntax;
internal static class SyntaxEquivalence
{
internal static bool AreEquivalent(SyntaxTree? before, SyntaxTree? after, Func<SyntaxKind, bool>? ignoreChildNode, bool topLevel)
{
if (before == after)
{
return true;
}
if (before == null || after == null)
{
return false;
}
return AreEquivalent(before.GetRoot(), after.GetRoot(), ignoreChildNode, topLevel);
}
public static bool AreEquivalent(SyntaxNode? before, SyntaxNode? after, Func<SyntaxKind, bool>? ignoreChildNode, bool topLevel)
{
Debug.Assert(!topLevel || ignoreChildNode == null);
if (before == null || after == null)
{
return before == after;
}
return AreEquivalentRecursive(before.Green, after.Green, ignoreChildNode, topLevel: topLevel);
}
public static bool AreEquivalent(SyntaxTokenList before, SyntaxTokenList after)
{
return AreEquivalentRecursive(before.Node, after.Node, ignoreChildNode: null, topLevel: false);
}
public static bool AreEquivalent(SyntaxToken before, SyntaxToken after)
{
return before.RawKind == after.RawKind && (before.Node == null || AreTokensEquivalent(before.Node, after.Node, ignoreChildNode: null));
}
private static bool AreTokensEquivalent(GreenNode? before, GreenNode? after, Func<SyntaxKind, bool>? ignoreChildNode)
{
if (before is null || after is null)
{
return (before is null && after is null);
}
// NOTE(cyrusn): Do we want to drill into trivia? Can documentation ever affect the
// global meaning of symbols? This can happen in java with things like the "@obsolete"
// clause in doc comment. However, i don't know if anything like that exists in C#.
// NOTE(cyrusn): I don't believe we need to examine skipped text. It isn't relevant from
// the perspective of global symbolic information.
Debug.Assert(before.RawKind == after.RawKind);
if (before.IsMissing != after.IsMissing)
{
return false;
}
// These are the tokens that don't have fixed text.
switch ((SyntaxKind)before.RawKind)
{
case SyntaxKind.IdentifierToken:
if (((Green.SyntaxToken)before).ValueText != ((Green.SyntaxToken)after).ValueText)
{
return false;
}
break;
case SyntaxKind.NumericLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.CharacterLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.StringLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.Utf8StringLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.SingleLineRawStringLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.Utf8SingleLineRawStringLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.MultiLineRawStringLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.Utf8MultiLineRawStringLiteralToken:
case SyntaxKind.InterpolatedStringTextToken:
if (((Green.SyntaxToken)before).Text != ((Green.SyntaxToken)after).Text)
{
return false;
}
break;
}
return AreNullableDirectivesEquivalent(before, after, ignoreChildNode);
}
private static bool AreEquivalentRecursive(GreenNode? before, GreenNode? after, Func<SyntaxKind, bool>? ignoreChildNode, bool topLevel)
{
if (before == after)
{
return true;
}
if (before == null || after == null)
{
return false;
}
if (before.RawKind != after.RawKind)
{
return false;
}
if (before.IsToken)
{
Debug.Assert(after.IsToken);
return AreTokensEquivalent(before, after, ignoreChildNode);
}
if (topLevel)
{
// Once we get down to the body level we don't need to go any further and we can
// consider these trees equivalent.
switch ((SyntaxKind)before.RawKind)
{
case SyntaxKind.Block:
case SyntaxKind.ArrowExpressionClause:
return AreNullableDirectivesEquivalent(before, after, ignoreChildNode);
}
// If we're only checking top level equivalence, then we don't have to go down into
// the initializer for a field. However, we can't put that optimization for all
// fields. For example, fields that are 'const' do need their initializers checked as
// changing them can affect binding results.
if ((SyntaxKind)before.RawKind == SyntaxKind.FieldDeclaration)
{
var fieldBefore = (Green.FieldDeclarationSyntax)before;
var fieldAfter = (Green.FieldDeclarationSyntax)after;
var isConstBefore = fieldBefore.Modifiers.Any((int)SyntaxKind.ConstKeyword);
var isConstAfter = fieldAfter.Modifiers.Any((int)SyntaxKind.ConstKeyword);
if (!isConstBefore && !isConstAfter)
{
ignoreChildNode = childKind => childKind == SyntaxKind.EqualsValueClause;
}
}
// NOTE(cyrusn): Do we want to avoid going down into attribute expressions? I don't
// think we can avoid it as there are likely places in the compiler that use these
// expressions. For example, if the user changes [InternalsVisibleTo("goo")] to
// [InternalsVisibleTo("bar")] then that must count as a top level change as it
// affects symbol visibility. Perhaps we could enumerate the places in the compiler
// that use the values inside source attributes and we can check if we're in an
// attribute with that name. It wouldn't be 100% correct (because of annoying things
// like using aliases), but would likely be good enough for the incremental cases in
// the IDE.
}
if (ignoreChildNode != null)
{
var e1 = before.ChildNodesAndTokens().GetEnumerator();
var e2 = after.ChildNodesAndTokens().GetEnumerator();
while (true)
{
GreenNode? child1 = null;
GreenNode? child2 = null;
// skip ignored children:
while (e1.MoveNext())
{
var c = e1.Current;
if (c != null && (c.IsToken || !ignoreChildNode((SyntaxKind)c.RawKind)))
{
child1 = c;
break;
}
}
while (e2.MoveNext())
{
var c = e2.Current;
if (c != null && (c.IsToken || !ignoreChildNode((SyntaxKind)c.RawKind)))
{
child2 = c;
break;
}
}
if (child1 == null || child2 == null)
{
// false if some children remained
return child1 == child2;
}
if (!AreEquivalentRecursive(child1, child2, ignoreChildNode, topLevel))
{
return false;
}
}
}
else
{
// simple comparison - not ignoring children
int slotCount = before.SlotCount;
if (slotCount != after.SlotCount)
{
return false;
}
for (int i = 0; i < slotCount; i++)
{
var child1 = before.GetSlot(i);
var child2 = after.GetSlot(i);
if (!AreEquivalentRecursive(child1, child2, ignoreChildNode, topLevel))
{
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
private static bool AreNullableDirectivesEquivalent(GreenNode before, GreenNode after, Func<SyntaxKind, bool>? ignoreChildNode)
{
// Fast path for when the caller does not care about nullable directives. This can happen in some IDE refactorings.
if (ignoreChildNode is object && ignoreChildNode(SyntaxKind.NullableDirectiveTrivia))
{
return true;
}
using var beforeDirectivesEnumerator = ((Green.CSharpSyntaxNode)before).GetDirectives().GetEnumerator();
using var afterDirectivesEnumerator = ((Green.CSharpSyntaxNode)after).GetDirectives().GetEnumerator();
while (true)
{
Green.DirectiveTriviaSyntax? beforeAnnotation = getNextNullableDirective(beforeDirectivesEnumerator);
Green.DirectiveTriviaSyntax? afterAnnotation = getNextNullableDirective(afterDirectivesEnumerator);
if (beforeAnnotation == null || afterAnnotation == null)
{
return beforeAnnotation == afterAnnotation;
}
if (!AreEquivalentRecursive(beforeAnnotation, afterAnnotation, ignoreChildNode, topLevel: false))
{
return false;
}
static Green.DirectiveTriviaSyntax? getNextNullableDirective(IEnumerator<Green.DirectiveTriviaSyntax> enumerator)
{
while (enumerator.MoveNext())
{
var current = enumerator.Current;
if (current.Kind == SyntaxKind.NullableDirectiveTrivia)
{
return current;
}
}
return null;
}
}
}
}
}
|