|
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.
// See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information.
using System;
using System.Composition;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Extensions.ContextQuery;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Editing;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Host.Mef;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Snippets;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Snippets.SnippetProviders;
namespace Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Snippets
{
[ExportSnippetProvider(nameof(ISnippetProvider), LanguageNames.CSharp), Shared]
internal class CSharpPropgSnippetProvider : AbstractCSharpAutoPropertySnippetProvider
{
[ImportingConstructor]
[Obsolete(MefConstruction.ImportingConstructorMessage, error: true)]
public CSharpPropgSnippetProvider()
{
}
public override string Identifier => "propg";
public override string Description => FeaturesResources.get_only_property;
protected override AccessorDeclarationSyntax? GenerateSetAccessorDeclaration(CSharpSyntaxContext syntaxContext, SyntaxGenerator generator)
{
// Interface cannot have properties with `private set` accessor.
// So if we are inside an interface, we just return null here.
// This causes the caller to just skip this `set` accessor
if (syntaxContext.ContainingTypeDeclaration is InterfaceDeclarationSyntax)
{
return null;
}
// Having a property with `set` accessor in a readonly struct leads to a compiler error.
// So if user executes snippet inside a readonly struct the right thing to do is to not generate `set` accessor at all
if (syntaxContext.ContainingTypeDeclaration is StructDeclarationSyntax structDeclaration &&
structDeclaration.Modifiers.Any(SyntaxKind.ReadOnlyKeyword))
{
return null;
}
return (AccessorDeclarationSyntax)generator.SetAccessorDeclaration(Accessibility.Private);
}
}
}
|